CARE USA Chaperoned Emails

23 10 2009

256CARENation

 

This was on SOFII this week (seriously, you need to check that site out!). Anyway this is a great concept.

A chaperoned email is an email that a publisher sends to its own online magazine subscribers, on behalf of a nonprofit. The email may ask for a donation, or ask for another action, such as writing a letter to a politician, or completing a survey. The email itself is usually branded with the nonprofit’s own email design, including logo and photos. This is often accompanied by an endorsement from the editor of the publication at the top.

Did it work:YES

Not only did the chaperoned emails raise $23,206 in unrestricted funds for CARE, they also added 376 new donors at an average donation of $62, with a net profit per donor after expenses of $23





Why dont we write how we speak

8 05 2009

cc1Here is a letter that was dropped into my door from a local politician who is up for election to the county council. I was actually reasonably impressed with some elements of the letter.

He signed each letter, or his team did, but they were signed and not printed with a signature. The letter was also personalised to the area of houses we live in. So he had taken the time to listen to what people were saying to him and then he spoke to us about it in his letter. Both nice touches. Although it is a shame that he didnt sign the letter with a blue pen, it would have really stood out.

But then he goes into politician speak, using words that none of use in our day to day lives….he speaks about addressing the matter with urgency, prioritising the matter, renewed energy and determination, Furthermore and please be assured!

Look these are all nice sentiments and I think his letter shows that he cares enough to listen. But why can he not speak to us like a human being in the rest of the letter. This could have been a much stronger letter than it is (and to be fair to him its one of the better ones I have seen in recent times). It baffles me why we turn into robots when we have a pen or keyboard in front of us!

I have spoken about this before, but as non profits we often fall into the trap of speaking to people with words that make sense to us or would have gotten us an A+ for grammer and use of language in school. But it doesnt make sense to the people we are speaking to, most of the time.  So try and write how you would speak. Make it feel like you are sitting at the kitchen table with the reader and you are chatting to them.





Backing up the case for doing DM.

30 04 2009

This time the case is more to do with sustained giving/regular giving. But two are linked (or should be). So just in case you needed more convincing after Mondays post from Damian,  Jonathon from Pareto posted something very similar on his blog last week. Combined the two make a compelling case.

I hope they are useful to you as you make your case…you are making a case for doing DM and regular giving arent you???

Cash is King.

…. let’s face it, when it comes to generating new charitable direct response donors, cash really doesn’t stack up anymore.

Consider this: when we look at the balance of cash versus monthly givers recruited through the benchmarking we undertake at Pareto Fundraising invariably we find the balance stacked heavily towards more cash donors recruited.

Often up to five times as many cash donors are recruited in a period than ongoing, monthly donors.

Yet when you compare the retention rates, even those channels delivering the lowest retention rates (typically street/door recruited donors, followed by DRTV) still retain around 75%-80% of monthly donors per year.

Contrast this with cash recruitment. When we recently looked at this the average 2nd gift rate (I.e. those donors who gave a cash gift and then gave a subsequent cash gift) it was as low as 30%. In other words, around 70% never gave again.

Of course the obvious rebuttal is that monthly donors are much harder to recruit and the cost per acquisition is higher, but the pay off long term is a no brainer.

In other words, you might pay more for a monthly donor upfront, and it may be bloody hard work finding them, but when you do, it’s difficult to find a case for recruiting onetime cash donors through your direct response program.

So cash might be king when balancing the books, but it ain’t when finding your next group of donors.

P.S. I hope Jonathon dosent mind me re-posting, I tried to comment on his blog asking if its ok, but couldnt submit the comment…sorry!





A good case for doing more DM

28 04 2009

Damian at Ask Direct did a great post a while back making the case for doing more DM. Ok its his business but what Damian is actually doing is reporting the results he has seen and its a really useful post.  Even more so becuase what he is saying is true!

If you are making the case for DM in your organisation take a read why Damian thinks now is the time to do more:

In short, because it will make you money. Today and into the future. In fact, it may be the most secure method of fundraising to invest in during a downturn.

But I would say that, wouldn’t I? I run a direct marketing agency.

Well let’s look at the data.

Of the five donor mailings we produced for clients last Christmas for which we have results and a valid comparator, four did better than in 2007 in terms of response rate and income. Average gifts varied – some steady, some up, some down. But overall income for the four in question was up on 2007.

OK, so donors are still giving. What about recruitment?

If anything, the picture is even better. Each of the four campaigns where we can benchmark against a previous campaign show better results for Christmas 2008 than 12 months previously.

Ah, you say, but the economy is deteriorating at such a pace that last Christmas isn’t relevant anymore. There’s another 100,000 people out of work. We’ve been battered, bludgeoned and budgeted by bad news. And anyway, Christmas was a last hurrah, the celtic tiger donors dispensing the last of their alms before battening down the hatches and canceling their foreign holidays, kitchen extensions and charity direct debits.

Actually, no. The sky hasn’t fallen in in 2009. It’s early days yet, but we’ve got initial results in from two campaigns so far and both are up – significantly – on 2008. And that’s for donor mailings and cold recruitment.

Donors are still giving. New donors are still signing up. While many of us are understandably trimming back it seems clear that, for ordinary people, the desire to help others is as strong – or stronger – than ever. Philanthropy is not the first thing go. Far from it.





Why Wait?

31 03 2009

wait_sign_2a

After 15 years I got my first donation ask from my favourite charity!

Scary but very true. I have been involved with this charity from, almost, the very start and I absolutely adore it. I think its one of the best organisations I know. Most of my work was not fundraising related but I did do a little bit of fundraising for them once.

I was always amazed that they never asked me to donate. You don’t get warmer than me. Well eventually I was asked and yes I will donate.

I know the thinking in the organisation was (or at least I think it was) that we cant ask those who support us in other ways to give mpney too. Of course you can. Here’s the thing if I didnt want to give, I just wouldnt. If I was offended by the ask, I would probably have let you know. So don’t pigeon hole supporters into categories.

Most importantly dont look at your supporters and think they wouldn’t like to give. Let them make that choice.

So don’t wait and ask today.





Improve your Direct Marketing

26 03 2009

I wasnt able to make the Fundraising Ireland seminar yesterday, but reports are it went great.

Over 200 people attended and the overall tone was positive, with many reporting record years for the year just gone. There was a consensus that fundraisers would have to adapt and sharpen practices but that there was still potential to weather the storm.

One of the presentations was on DM. Click here to check out  Damian O’Broin’s (AskDirect) presentation on Improving your direct marketing.  Unlike a lot of presentations we sometimes get its full of some great tips Damian hasnt just danced around the topic in the hope you will send business his way, he has gone into some detail and Im sure everyone who attended took some great advice away.

My favourite slide….It’s a Recession…Spend More Money!





SOFII Update

16 03 2009

Have you been checking out SOFII? Here a review of whats new:

Now on SOFII there’s the start of a new feature, The facts on how people give. Plus a range of new articles and exhibits:





Fundraising Ireland DM session

14 01 2009

I forgot to post about this before. Fundraising Ireland are orgnising their first seminar for 2009 and its an afternoon on Managing Integrated DM Campaigns.

I have to say Fundraising Ireland are doing a great job (all volunteers too) and any sessions I have been to have been well worth it. I am out of the country otherwise I would be attending.

A joint Fundraising Ireland / IDMA event, the speakers are:

Nick Thomas, Executive Creative Director of Tangible Response in UK, DM agency for some of UK’s largest charities and he will speak on ‘Effective communication in Charity Marketing’.

Stephen Stynes, Chairman of the IDMA will tackle the topic of managing DM in a challenging economic environment.

Ruth Guy, Director of Fundraising and Marketing at Barnardos and winner of Marketer of the Year, will offer some practical insights into recent Barnardos campaigns.

Check out the details here





Wordle

13 01 2009

wordle1

I have come across this on a few other blogs and I used it myself in writing a letter recently.  Wordle  puts all the words you are using in text you select and it puts it in a cloud. The more the word appears the bigger it is in the cloud. So you can take a look at a letter that you are writing and see what comes across the most. Is it me, me, me or is it you, impact, thanks? Try it, its like seeing your copy with a whole new set of eyes. The Wordle cloud above is from an Oxfam Press Release.

Check it out here





Sending emails

12 01 2009

Seth Godin has some good advice on sending emails. Basically saying that you should make them personal, dont just merge, its lazy and you will just end up in the spam/junk mail folder.  I like his point….If it’s important enough for someone to read, it’s important enough for you to rewrite.  Check the hints out on his blog here





Sticky Moments

8 01 2009

sticky1

I was sent this via the dmr interactive newsletter I signed up to. Unfortunately I read it late at night and it took me ages to get to sleep because it got my mind thinking about how this applies to the non profit sector. So I thought I would share it with you.

“A lie can get halfway around the world before the truth can even get its boots on.” — Mark Twain

Why do urban legends, conspiracy ideas, public health scares, and PPM theories seem to flow effortlessly through emails or conversations while important and true ideas and insights often get lost? In his most recent book, Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die, author and Stanford professor, Chip Heath says that the key to communication effectiveness and return on investment is to create messages that “stick.”

A sticky message is one that people understand when they hear it, that they remember later on, and that changes something about the way they think or act.  

A great example Heath cites is the campaign to end roadside littering in Texas. The Texas transportation agency determined that the biggest offenders were 18-34 men who were anti-establishment, anti-authority and seemingly anti-law.

They named the target group, “Bubba.” The message had to resonate with Bubba. From there, they developed the highly sticky, highly familiar slogan, “Don’t Mess With Texas.” The threat connotation spoke to Bubba’s tough-guy image while the double meaning enlisted their support to keep Texas clean. Ironically, the key to the campaign was having a clear understanding of the small target (age and psychographically) in order to develop a sticky message. From there, the “Don’t Mess With Texas” message spread far beyond becoming a quasi-state motto.

We spend months coming up with the right strategy and idea, but then spend only a few hours thinking about how to translate that position into a marketing message that’s concrete, simple and meaningful to target consumers. There’s a much more effective approach. It’s worth spending time making sure that the light bulb that has gone on inside your head also goes on inside the heads of your target consumer.

In addition, instead of focusing on creating a sticky message among the key target audience, marketers often make the mistake of focusing on the medium. Heath says get the message right –a sticky message– and it works in any medium. Get it wrong, and it doesn’t matter how much you spend.

“People who think too much about the medium [TV, outdoor, email, etc.] are making the same mistake that people have made for years in education. Remember how the 8-millimeter film was going to revolutionize education? Then the VCR? Then the personal computer? The medium can certainly help, but an 8-millimeter film didn’t salvage a bad math lesson.”

Chip Heath’s research suggests that sticky ideas share six basic traits.

Simplicity. Messages are most memorable if they are short and deep. Glib sound bites are short, but they don’t last. Proverbs, such as the golden rule, are short but also deep enough to guide the behavior of people over generations.

Unexpectedness. Something that sounds like common sense won’t stick. Look for the parts of your message that are uncommon sense. Such messages generate interest and curiosity.

Concreteness. Abstract language and ideas don’t leave sensory impressions; concrete images do. Compare “get an American on the moon in this decade” with “seize leadership in the space race through targeted technology initiatives and enhanced team-based routines.”

Credibility. Will the audience buy the message? Can a case be made for the message or is it a confabulation of spin? Very often, a person trying to convey a message cites outside experts when the most credible source is the person listening to the message. Questions like –”Have you experienced this?”– are often more credible than outside experts.

Emotions. Case studies that involve people also move them. “We are wired,” Heath writes, “to feel things for people, not abstractions.”

Stories. We all tell stories every day. Why? “Research shows that mentally rehearsing a situation helps us perform better when we encounter that situation,” Heath writes. “Stories act as a kind of mental flight simulator, preparing us to respond more quickly and effectively.”

check out the MadeToStick.com site. For a PDF of the authors’ SUCCESS Map, click here.





Nostalgia

16 12 2008

Maybe its the time of year but there have been a few things that I have come across lately that made me nostaligic….and to think that I should be tapping into this nostalgia for fundraising (it would have to be very targeted but I really believe it would work).

evelThe first thing was on the RTE website where they had a section called Christmas starts here. They have some top 5 lists, but the one I really liked was the Toys you thought you wanted…it had a list of toys that I remember as a child either getting or wanting or knowing others who got them. It brought back good memories

 

The second thing that got me thinking was a post by Tim who wrote  a post called “I Love Woolworths”. Woolworths is practically a British institution, you could buy anything in Woolies and Tim recalls as a child

This is where my Mum clothed me. This is where I’d ‘borrow’ the odd sweet, save up and buy m first single, and obsess over those impossibly long felt-tip sets.

Woolworths is in all sorts of financial troubles these days and Tim laments the fact that he wont be able to share these memories with his own children. What was interesting was when Tim said

A friend told me the other night that if someone knocked on his door asking for a pound for Woolworths he’d “throw a couple in”. Which is an odd thought because he’d probably tell a charity that “times were a bit hard…”

Interesting stuff.

This got me to thiniking about other things that make me feel nostalgic. The ads below are two great examples. The first one is the Kellog’s Christmas Ad that reminds me of being a child and the magic of Christmas. Im not sure how old the ad is, its a good few years old, but it still works and for me when I see that ad, I just get that “Christmas Feeling”

This next one is a radio ad from Ireland. Again this just gets me everytime. I hope it translates to other markets but there is just something magical about it (from an advertisers point of view its gold, people actually ask radio stations when the ad is going to be played!).

I think as charities we can take two lessons here. The first is one Tim talks about and that is the fact that

Charities should try and engage more with children and their families. Become integral players in childhood memories. I know this might seem like long-term planning but it’s really not that long before a child in primary school will be graduating and starting work.

The second I think is that charities should look to capitalise on the feelings of nostalgia. I was thinking that if I was to get a mailing that played to my memories of childhood and what Christmas was like for me and then related that to those who wont get to have those memories, it would really make me put my hands in my pocket to help. Ok I know that it would have to be really targeted, but thats ok. I think there is plenty of scope here to do some great work.

We need to get people feeling about our causes. Its not about the stats or the facts. They are cold. We need people to get emotional. Whatever that emotion is. Nostalgia is just one, and I hope I have given you some good examples of what is working outside of the not for profit world.






2008 Gold Award Winners

18 09 2008

When planning a new DM appeal how do you decide what you are going to do? Well one of the things I like to try do is see what others are doing and where better to start than with some award winning DM pieces.

Fundraising Successhas a great article listing and talking about the 2008 Gold Winners for Fundraising Success in seven categories: Direct-Mail Acquisition (50,000 or more mailed, and fewer than 50,000 mailed); Direct-Mail Renewal (50,000 or more mailed, and fewer than 50,000 mailed); Direct-Mail Special Appeal; E-philanthropy (for campaigns centered around e-mail and Web, with no direct-mail components); and Multichannel (for campaigns that combine any number of strategies, including direct mail).

Worth a read or if you just want to check out the winners list check it out here





Start with a Classified

5 06 2008