Sponsorship is a tricky thing

As the discussion on my Volvic Post has shown, Sponsorship isn’t straightforward. Here is an interesting piece I found on the Fundraising Institute of Australia Blog .

 In an article on 14 April in The Australian Financial Review it is noted that the ‘commercial path’ was rejected in favour of naming the Melbourne Theatre Company’s new theatre after the company’s founder.  Naming rights have become increasingly popular as a way of recognising benefaction – but there can be hidden risks which may relate to organisational reputation and potential conflicts of interest. As some North American institutions have found, physically gouging out a benefactor’s name from the material fabric of a building is messy and unsightly.  

Is there a need for less ostentation and a greater reflection of true benefaction without personal or corporate gratification

Its something we all have to deal with, whether its the title rights to a sponsor for a campaign or the naming of a new wing in a hospital.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s